PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(Suppl_1): 231-235 1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stegmayr, B.
Right arrow Articles by Plum-Wirell, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stegmayr, B.
Right arrow Articles by Plum-Wirell, M
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue Suppl_1, S231-S235
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

PD treatment for severe congestive heart failure

BG Stegmayr, R Banga, L Lundberg, AM Wikdahl, and M Plum-Wirell

Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Umea, Sweden.

Our objective was to evaluate if peritoneal dialysis (PD) could improve survival of patients with progressive severe congestive heart failure resistant to drug therapy. The patients were selected by the cardiologist in cooperation with a nephrologist, including patients not responding to conventional medication with an expected fatal outcome within the next months. The study included 16 consecutive patients with a chronic progressive severe refractory heart failure (sHF) of NYHA class III (n = 6) or IV (n = 10) who did not respond to diuretics and angiotension converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. They had a mean age of 60 years (+/- 14, range 30-75, median 62 years). Nine of the patients had sHF as the only reason for initiating PD (all NYHA IV), while 7 also needed dialysis due to uremia. Five of 7 had been on hemodialysis but switched to PD due to a progressive congestive sHF. In 2 patients, PD was decided already at start of dialysis therapy due to the severity of their heart failure. The reason for sHF was: valvular dysfunction (n = 5) with defect prosthesis (n = 3); in the course of a myocardial infarction (n = 4); and cardiomyopathy (n = 4). Tenckhoff catheters were inserted under local anesthesia and ultrafiltration was started and maintained until discharge. The survival time and change in heart size by x-ray was used for analyses. All patients improved their stage of congestive heart failure by NYHA classification already during the first month. Six patients died during the follow-up period due to cardiac reasons (sudden death, relapse of sHF) after a mean of 10.7 months (+/- 3.7, range 1-24 months). Ten were alive after a median observation period of 10 months (+/- 12.5, range 1-36 months). Heart size was reduced in 15 of the patients. Three of the patients with sHF but without uremia could stop the PD. The results showed that ultrafiltration by PD was easy to perform despite low initial blood pressure. The sHF was reduced and life span was prolonged with improved quality of life.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.