PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(4): 398-405 1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fung, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mittelman, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fung, L.
Right arrow Articles by Mittelman, M.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue 4, 398-405
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Biocompatibility of silver-coated peritoneal dialysis catheter in a porcine model

LC Fung, AE Khoury, SI Vas, C Smith, DG Oreopoulos, and MW Mittelman

Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown that silver formulations coated onto implantable materials retard bacterial colonization and reduce the incidence of catheter-related infections. The objective of this study was to assess the histologic effects of sputter-coated silver/ silicone implants on host tissue. DESIGN: Sputter silver-coated silicone peritoneal dialysis catheter segments with and without Dacron cuffs were implanted in the subcutaneous fat and muscle in 4 pigs. Noncoated implants served as controls. The specimens were retrieved at 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, 10, 12, and 27 weeks. EXPERIMENTAL ANIMALS: Four 6-week-old male Yorkshire-Landrace pigs (5-6 kg) were used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Histologic parameters evaluated included the degree of inflammation, the number of giant cells, the extent of silver particulate inclusions, and the thickness of the capsules. All specimens were evaluated by a single blinded pathologist. Microbiologic analyses were also performed. RESULTS: The silver-coated catheters were associated with less inflammation than were the noncoated catheters, both in fat and muscle (p = 0.04). The number of giant cells was also lower around the silver-coated than the non-coated catheters, which were implanted in subcutaneous fat (p < 0.05). Particulate inclusions compatible with silver or silver oxide were observed only in tissue around silver-coated implants (p < 0.0001). The thickness of the capsules and the extent of the inflammatory zones were not significantly different. There was no evidence of infection-related changes. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the sputter silver coating does not act as a significant tissue irritant.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.