PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(3): 302-306 1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Voudiklari, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tzamaloukas, A.
Right arrow Articles by Voudiklari, S
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue 3, 302-306
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Continuous peritoneal dialysis in heavyweight individuals: urea and creatinine clearances

AH Tzamaloukas, A Dimitriadis, GH Murata, N Nicolopoulou, D Malhotra, EV Balaskas, J Kakavas, S Antoniou, NV Dombros, E Batzili, and S Voudiklari

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87108, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether or not continuous peritoneal dialysis (CPD) can provide acceptable levels of normalized urea and creatinine clearance in heavyweight individuals. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of urea and creatinine clearance studies. SETTING: CPD patients followed in four dialysis units in Albuquerque, two dialysis units in Thessaloniki, and two dialysis units in Athens. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and ninety-nine patients on CPD with 266 clearance determinations between 1991 and 1995. INTERVENTIONS: The heavyweight group consisted of 22 patients (24 clearance studies) weighing 100 kg or more (109 +/- 8.7 kg) at the time of the clearance study. All subjects were obese. The reference group consisted of 177 CPD subjects (242 clearance studies) of normal weight (68.7 +/- 12.2 kg). Urea fractional clearance (KT/V) and normalized creatinine clearance (Ccr) were compared between the heavyweight and the reference groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The lowest acceptable weekly levels were set at 1.70 for KT/V and 54.4 L/1.73 m2 for Ccr. RESULTS: Weekly KT/V was 1.75 +/- 0.41 in the heavyweight group and 1.94 +/- 0.52 in the reference group (p = 0.047). Corresponding weekly Ccr levels were 64.0 +/- 24.3 and 77.6 +/- 40.3 L/1.73 m2, respectively (p = 0.021). In the heavyweight group, 13 studies (54.2%) had acceptable KT/V values compared to 160 studies (66.1%) in the reference group (NS). Corresponding values for acceptable Ccr were 17 (70.8%) and 165 (68.2%), respectively (NS). Drain volume was 12.96 +/- 4.40 L/24 hours in the heavyweight group and 9.63 +/- 2.58 L/24 hours in the reference group (p = 0.001). High daily exchange volume was delivered by a combination of daily continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) and nocturnal automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) in 13/16 heavyweight studies. This combination was tolerated better than any other method of delivering a large daily exchange volume. CONCLUSION: Although normalized urea and creatinine clearances are lower in obese, heavyweight individuals than in lean CPD subjects with lower weight, approximately equal percentages of these two groups achieve acceptable clearance levels. However, heavyweight individuals require larger-than-usual daily exchange volumes. The preferred way to deliver these large dialysate volumes is a combination of daily CAPD and nocturnal APD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.