PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(1): 73-77 1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Aufricht, C
Right arrow Articles by Greenbaum, L
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Aufricht, C
Right arrow Articles by Greenbaum, L
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue 1, 73-77
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Estimation of total creatinine clearance is unreliable in children on peritoneal dialysis

C Aufricht, E Kitzmuller, MA Lothaller, T Muller, R Birnbacher, E Balzar, and L Greenbaum

Kinderdialyse, Universtatskinderklinik Wien, Vienna, Austria.

OBJECTIVE: To test the reliability of creatinine clearance in children on peritoneal dialysis (PD). DESIGN: Longitudinal, case-controlled. SETTING: Routine clinic visits at the pediatric dialysis unit of the Universitatskinderklinik of Vienna. PATIENTS: Eleven children (2-13 years, 10-55 kg) with end-stage renal disease on PD. INTERVENTIONS: Creatinine clearance (CCr) was determined by measuring creatinine excretion (ECr) over 24 hours in both dialysate and urine. Each child had three to five separate measurements of their CCr. At the same time we also calculated the Schwartz formula clearance from the patient's height and serum creatinine, using a modified correlate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reliability of CCr was assessed by two approaches. First, we compared each serial measurement with the mean value for each patient and thereby assessed the "intramethodical" variability. Second, we compared each CCr with the simultaneous formula clearance and assessed the "intermethodical" disagreement. RESULTS: Twenty-seven percent of the measurements of CCr were classified as unreliable based on a comparison with the mean value for each patient. Reliability was closely correlated with residual renal function (p < 0.01); only 12% of the measurements in the anuric patients were classified as unreliable (vs 31% in the patients with residual renal function). The simultaneous formula clearance was less variable than the CCr. The formula clearance had a sensitivity of 93% and a specificity of 60% for detecting unreliable values of CCr. CONCLUSION: Estimation of total CCr is unreliable in pediatric patients on PD. A simultaneous formula clearance can be used to detect which values are unreliable.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.