PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 16(1): 34-40 1996
© 1996 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Rigby, R.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 16, Issue 1, 34-40
Copyright © 1996 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

The role of DEXA bone densitometry in evaluating renal osteodystrophy in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients

DW Johnson, HD McIntyre, A Brown, J Freeman, and RJ Rigby

Department of Renal Medicine, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess the clinical utility of total and regional bone densitometry in a large continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) population and to determine the clinical, biochemical, and radiographic variables that best identified osteopenic CAPD patients. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: A cross-sectional study was performed on 45 CAPD patients (19 males, 26 females), comprising the total CAPD population at the Princess Alexandra Hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Total body (TB), anteroposterior lumbar spine (APL), femoral neck (FN), Ward's triangle (WT), and skull bone mineral densities (BMDs) were measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) and then correlated with clinical, biochemical, and radiographic indices of uremic osteodystrophy. RESULTS: BMDs were not significantly different from age- and sex-matched reference population data. Considerable regional variation of BMD Z scores were noted between FN (-0.11 +/- 0.23), WT (-0.11 +/- 0.22), and APL (1.22 +/- 0.04) (p = 0.003). APLZ scores were significantly reduced in patients with a previous history of fracture (-1.36 +/- 1.07 vs 0.89 +/- 0.31), bone pain (-0.72 +/- 1.08 vs 1.01 +/- 0.31), or steroid treatment (-0.62 +/- 0.39 vs 1.16 +/- 0.35). Increased BMD Z scores for APL (1.82 +/- 0.57 vs 0.38 +/- 0.29, p < 0.05), FN (0.32 +/- 0.36 vs -0.38 +/- 0.29, p = 0.014), and WT (0.45 +/- 0.38 vs -0.45 +/- 0.26, p < 0.05) were found in patients with radiographic hyperparathyroid bone disease. Both APL BMD Z scores and skull BMDs were weakly correlated with PTH (r = -0.33, p < 0.05 and r = -0.33, p < 0.05, respectively) and with CAPD duration (r = 0.30, p < 0.05 and r = -0.30, p < 0.05). Generally, however, total body and regional BMDs were poorly related to age, renal disease type, dialysis duration, renal failure duration, serum aluminum, calcium, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, osteocalcin, and parathyroid hormone. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the prevalence of osteopenia is not increased in CAPD patients. Clinical and biochemical parameters do not reliably predict BMD measurements, but prior steroids and bone symptoms are major risk factors for important bone loss. Although DEXA can reliably detect osteopenia in different skeletal regions, its usefulness in detecting osteodystrophy is limited by the confounding effects of superimposed hyperparathyroid osteosclerosis, which increases BMD.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1996 by Multimed Inc.