PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 15(6): 226-230 1995
© 1995 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gokal, R
Right arrow Articles by Peers, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gokal, R
Right arrow Articles by Peers, E.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 15, Issue 6, 226-230
Copyright © 1995 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Clinical Trial

Peritonitis occurrence in a multicenter study of icodextrin and glucose in CAPD. MIDAS Study Group. Multicenter Investigation of Icodextrin in Ambulatory Dialysis

R Gokal, CD Mistry, and EM Peers

Manchester Royal Infirmary, U.K.

OBJECTIVE: To compare peritonitis occurrence and outcome in a large U.K. study Multicentre Investigation of Icodextrin in Ambulatory Dialysis (MIDAS). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled 6-month comparison of icodextrin with glucose for the long dwell in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. SETTING: Eleven CAPD units in U.K. teaching hospital. PATIENTS: A total of 209 patients established on CAPD for at least 3 months (103 control, 106 icodextrin). Twenty-three control (C) and 22 icodextrin (I) patients experienced peritonitis during the study. INTERVENTION: Patients who had peritonitis remained on treatment (unless CAPD was withdrawn, temporarily or permanently). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were the rate of peritonitis and duration of CAPD treatment prestudy; the rate of peritonitis episodes and their outcome during study; the effect of peritonitis on laboratory variables, serum icodextrin metabolites, and ultrafiltration efficacy. RESULTS: Prestudy: Nine (39%) of C but 14 (64%) of I patients had suffered previous peritonitis episode(s), with overall rates of 0.58 and 0.78 episodes per patient-year, respectively. DURING STUDY: There were 31 C episodes and 35 I episodes, with overall rates of 0.76 and 0.93 per patient-year, respectively. The increase in the C and I groups was 31% and 19%, respectively. Serum osmolality and sodium levels were unaffected by peritonitis, and there was no increase in serum icodextrin metabolites during peritonitis. Overnight ultrafiltration volume during peritonitis (mean +/- SD) declined slightly from 218 +/- 354 mL to 185 +/- 299 mL (NS) in the control group, but increased in the icodextrin group from 570 +/- 146 mL to 723 +/- 218 mL (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Using icodextrin for the long dwell in CAPD does not increase the rate of peritonitis, nor does it alter the outcome of peritonitis. Peritonitis does not affect uptake of icodextrin from the peritoneum.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1995 by Multimed Inc.