PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 14(1): 61-65 1994
© 1994 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sennesael, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verbeelen, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sennesael, J.
Right arrow Articles by Verbeelen, D.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 14, Issue 1, 61-65
Copyright © 1994 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

The impact of peritonitis on peritoneal and systemic acid-base status of patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

JJ Sennesael, GC De Smedt, P Van der Niepen, and DL Verbeelen

Renal Unit, Akademisch Ziekenhuis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the possible effects of peritonitis on peritoneal and systemic acid-base status. DESIGN: pH, pCO2, lactate, and total leukocyte and differential count were simultaneously determined in the overnight dwell peritoneal dialysis effluent (PDE) and arterial blood in noninfected patients (controls) and on days 1, 3, and 5 from the onset of peritonitis. SETTING: University multidisciplinary dialysis program. PATIENTS: Prospective analysis of 63 peritonitis episodes occurring in 30 adult CAPD patients in a single center. RESULTS: In controls, mean (+/- SD) acid-base parameters were pH 7.41 +/- 0.05, pCO2 43.5 +/- 2.6 mm Hg, lactate 2.5 +/- 1.5 mmol/L in the PDE, and pH 7.43 +/- 0.04, PaCO2 36.8 +/- 3.8 mm Hg, lactate 1.4 +/- 0.7 mmol/L in the blood. In sterile (n = 6), gram-positive (n = 34), and Staphylococcus aureus (n = 9) peritonitis PDE pH's on day 1 were, respectively, 7.29 +/- 0.07, 7.32 +/- 0.07, and 7.30 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.05 vs control). In gram-negative peritonitis (n = 14) PDE pH was 7.21 +/- 0.08 (p < 0.05 vs all other groups). A two-to-threefold increase in PDE lactate was observed in all peritonitis groups, but a rise in pCO2 was only seen in gram-negative peritonitis. Acid-base profile of PDE had returned to control values by day 3 in sterile, gram-positive and Staphylococcus aureus peritonitis and by day 5 in gram-negative peritonitis. Despite a slight increase in plasma lactate on the first day of peritonitis, arterial blood pH was not affected by peritonitis. CONCLUSION: PDE pH is decreased in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) peritonitis, even in the absence of bacterial growth. In gram-negative peritonitis, PDE acidosis is more pronounced and prolonged, and pCO2 is markedly increased. Arterial blood pH is not affected by peritonitis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1994 by Multimed Inc.