PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 14(1): 52-55 1994
© 1994 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kumano, K
Right arrow Articles by Sofue, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kumano, K
Right arrow Articles by Sofue, K
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 14, Issue 1, 52-55
Copyright © 1994 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Minimizing the drainage period for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

K Kumano, S Yokota, T Sakai, H Kazama, and K Sofue

Kidney Center, Kitasato University Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To examine features of drainage flow and to determine whether the drainage period could be safely reduced in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients. DESIGN: Open nonrandomized prospective study in CAPD patients. SETTING: The kidney center in a tertiary care university hospital. PATIENTS: Fourteen CAPD patients with good catheter function. INTERVENTIONS: Drainage flow pattern was studied using a 2-L dialysate. The drainage period was reduced from 28 minutes (mean) to 10 minutes throughout a short-term, 2-month study period and a long-term, 6-month study period for 10 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ultrafiltration volume, body weight, and peritoneal clearance. RESULTS: A kinetics analysis of the drainage period and volume indicated a positive linear correlation with two different slopes: one for rapid drainage for the first 5-7 minutes and one for subsequent slow drainage. The effluent exceeded 80% in the former period. Ultrafiltration volume and body weight showed no change due to the reduction. Improved peritoneal clearance of small molecular substances could not be confirmed despite a 5% increase in the effective dialysis period. Nearly all patients were satisfied with the reduction and desired its continuation. CONCLUSIONS: Ten minutes is a sufficient drainage period for most CAPD patients with a 2-L dialysate volume. This may possibly allow an increase in daily activities and an effective peritoneal membrane dialysate contact period.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1994 by Multimed Inc.