PDI http://www.pdiconnect.com/misc/meetings.dtl
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 13(1): 50-54
1993
© 1993 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waite, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waite, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fong, I.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 13, Issue 1, 50-54
Copyright © 1993 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Articles

Poor response to oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of peritonitis in patients on intermittent peritoneal dialysis

NM Waite, MD Johnson, NR Webster, and IW Fong

St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical value of oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of peritonitis in an intermittent peritoneal dialysis (IPD) population. DESIGN: Open nonrandomized prospective study. SETTING: Nephrology Peritoneal Dialysis Unit in a tertiary care, teaching hospital of the University of Toronto. PATIENTS: Subjects were participants of the IPD program with an acute episode of peritonitis defined as at least two of the following: 1. signs and symptoms of peritonitis, 2. cloudy peritoneal fluid with a white blood cell count of > 100/microL, 3. demonstration of bacteria in peritoneal effluent by gram stain or culture. Ten patients were enrolled in the study, but two were withdrawn because of side effects and growth of a resistant bacteria. INTERVENTIONS: Ciprofloxacin 750 mg po q12h for 2 doses, then 750 mg daily or 500 mg twice daily for 10 days. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Efficacy was determined by clinical and microbiological assessment. Cure was defined as resolution of signs and symptoms with eradication of the causative organism. Peritoneal effluent and blood samples were analyzed for ciprofloxacin concentration. RESULTS: Ciprofloxacin was effective in treating only one of ten episodes of peritonitis. Seven patients were defined as microbiological failures (persistence or relapse of organisms). The signs and symptoms of peritonitis improved in 2 patients, but the remaining 5 failed clinically. Only Gram-positive organisms were cultured. CONCLUSIONS: Ciprofloxacin cannot be recommended for the treatment of intermittent peritoneal dialysis-related Gram-positive bacterial peritonitis.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1993 by Multimed Inc.