PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Perit Dial Int 12(4): 378-383
1992
© 1992 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Frenken, L.
Right arrow Articles by Koene, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Frenken, L.
Right arrow Articles by Koene, R.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 12, Issue 4, 378-383
Copyright © 1992 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis


Clinical Trial

Intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human erythropoietin

LA Frenken, DG Struijk, PJ Coppens, RG Tiggeler, RT Krediet, and RA Koene

Department of Medicine, University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of intraperitoneal administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO) in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients compared to subcutaneous rHuEPO. DESIGN: Prospective analysis of an open, nonrandomized investigation. SETTING: Outpatient CAPD clinics in two university hospitals. PATIENTS: Nine adult CAPD patients receiving rHuEPO intraperitoneally and 8 patients receiving rHuEPO subcutaneously. INTERVENTION: One hundred units of rHuEPO per kilogram of body weight were administered three times a week for 8 weeks or until the target hematocrit of 35% was reached. Thereafter, dosages of rHuEPO were adjusted for response. Intraperitoneal rHuEPO was administered in 1 L of dialysis solution during the night. MEASUREMENTS: Efficacy was assessed by measuring the increase in hemoglobin. Tolerance was assessed by monitoring side effects. RESULTS: In the first 8 weeks of treatment hemoglobin concentration increased from 64.5 +/- 12.9 g/L to 98.3 +/- 16.1 g/L (p < 0.0005) in the intraperitoneally treated group. In the subcutaneously treated group hemoglobin increased significantly faster (p < 0.05) from 72.5 +/- 4.8 g/L to 119.2 +/- 11.3 g/L (p < 0.0005) in the same period. Antihypertensive medication had to be increased or instituted in most of the patients in both groups. The incidence of peritonitis in the intraperitoneally treated group was not increased when compared to the pretreatment incidence. CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneously administered rHuEPO is superior to intraperitoneally administered rHuEPO with regard to the required dosages. However, the results of this study show that intraperitoneal administration of rHuEPO might be a convenient and safe alternative when subcutaneous administration is undesirable.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1992 by Multimed Inc.