OBJECTIVE: To audit the outcome of patients treated at home by hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). DESIGN: Retrospective comparison of nondiabetic hemodialysis patients with age- and sex-matched nondiabetic patients treated by CAPD. SETTING: Renal Units, Stobhill General Hospital and Western Infirmary, Glasgow, providing the home dialysis service for the West of Scotland. PATIENTS: Between 1982 and 1988, 139 hemodialysis patients starting treatment at home, compared with 139 matched patients starting CAPD over the same time period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics and cardiovascular risk factors at the start of home treatment. Patient and technique survival with both forms of dialysis. RESULTS: Patients selected for home hemodialysis were less likely to be smokers (p < 0.02) and to have electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia or left ventricular hypertrophy (p < 0.05) than patients treated by CAPD. Patient survival and technique survival (excluding death and renal transplantation) at 3 years were 93.8% versus 86.2% (p < 0.05) and 94.2% versus 80.8% (p < 0.04) for hemodialysis and CAPD, respectively. Cardiovascular events were responsible for the majority of deaths in both groups, but there was a greater proportion of deaths from other causes in patients treated by CAPD. There was no significant difference in the transplantation rate between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Home dialysis is an effective method of renal replacement treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. The results of hemodialysis are superior to CAPD, but this may be partly due to selection bias.

Copyright © 1992 by Multimed Inc.