PDI
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Perit Dial Int 10(1): 63-66
1990
© 1990 International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Akyol, A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Akyol, A.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, M.
Peritoneal Dialysis International, Vol 10, Issue 1, 63-66
Copyright © 1990 by International Society for Peritoneal Dialysis

Clinical Trial

A comparison of two types of catheters for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD)

AM Akyol, C Porteous, and MW Brown

University Department of Surgery, Western Infirmary, Glasgow, United Kingdom.

This study was undertaken to critically examine the value of the curled Tenckhoff catheter for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) access with respect to the incidence of catheter-related complications. In the setting of a prospective, randomised, double-blind comparison, we were unable to demonstrate any advantage of the curled Tenckhoff catheter over the conventional straight type.






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Multimed Inc. logo
Copyright © 1990 by Multimed Inc.